FICTIONAL EXAMPLE · NOT CLIENT WORK · ALL COMPANIES, SYSTEMS, AND FINDINGS ARE INVENTED
Representative deliverable

Revenue Data Blueprint

Choose between two fictional examples showing how the same Blueprint process adapts to very different business problems.

SELECT AN EXAMPLE · 2 OF 2
CompanyHarbor & Field Advisory (fictional)
Business modelProfessional services
Primary questionWhich sources create signed work?
Recommended stackHubSpot + Google Sheets
01 · Executive summary

The decision Harbor & Field cannot make

“Which referral partners and marketing sources produce the most valuable signed engagements?”

The partners remember where some clients came from, HubSpot records a source for others, and finance keeps signed contract values in a monthly spreadsheet. No report connects all three consistently, so the firm cannot decide where to invest its relationship-building time.

Primary gap

Source lives in memory

Referral source is missing or entered as free text for 42% of signed engagements.

Manual burden

Two days every month

An operations manager combines CRM exports, invoices, and a partner-maintained contract sheet by hand.

Recommendation

Keep the current tools

The firm does not need a warehouse. A governed Sheet and cleaner HubSpot process can answer the question.

02 · Current workflow

Where the answer breaks down

STEPCURRENT PROCESSPROBLEMSIMPLE FIX
Inquiry arrivesHubSpot form, direct email, or partner introductionDirect introductions bypass source captureRequired source field during contact creation
Proposal sentTracked in HubSpot notesNo consistent proposal status or valueFour defined deal stages and expected value
Contract signedAdded to a partner-owned SheetCompany names do not always match HubSpotStore the HubSpot company ID in the Sheet
Invoice issuedQuickBooksInvoice customer is not linked to the CRM dealMonthly export matched through company ID
Monthly reportManual combination of three exportsSlow, fragile, and difficult to verifyProtected formulas and one refresh checklist
03 · Recommended system

A governed spreadsheet—not a data platform

The business question is important, but the data volume and reporting frequency do not justify a warehouse. The recommendation improves collection and creates one controlled reporting workbook.

Capture consistentlyHubSpot source categoryNamed referral partnerDeal stage and value
Combine simplyProtected Google SheetHubSpot monthly exportQuickBooks monthly exportStable company ID
Answer clearlySigned value by sourceConversion by referral partnerTime from inquiry to signatureMissing-data checklist
Why this is enough: the report is needed monthly, the source list is small, and one operations owner maintains it. The firm should revisit a warehouse only if system count, reporting frequency, or team access grows materially.
04 · 30-day roadmap

Fix collection first, then automate the report

WEEK 01 · DEFINE

Agree on the language

  • Approve six source categories
  • Define a signed engagement
  • Assign one reporting owner
WEEK 02 · CAPTURE

Repair the workflow

  • Add required HubSpot fields
  • Standardize deal stages
  • Backfill active opportunities
WEEKS 03–04 · REPORT

Build and hand off

  • Create the governed Sheet
  • Validate against signed contracts
  • Record the refresh walkthrough
05 · Implementation boundary

What the proposed lightweight build includes

Included

  • HubSpot field and deal-stage design
  • Governed Google Sheets reporting model
  • Source, partner, contract value, and conversion reporting
  • Missing-data and reconciliation checks
  • Documentation and recorded handoff

Not included

  • A warehouse or new BI platform
  • Full CRM migration or cleanup
  • Bookkeeping or QuickBooks administration
  • Marketing or referral-program management
  • Ongoing monthly report operation

The right answer does not have to be the biggest system

This fictional example shows how a Blueprint can lead to a simple, dependable solution. The recommendation follows the business question—not a predetermined technology stack.